Guess what show I was cutting when I grabbed that screenshot!
- Broadcast engineering and IT related links and stuff. Maybe some music, films and other things.
Friday, November 25, 2005
VideoReDo
Guess what show I was cutting when I grabbed that screenshot!
Thursday, November 24, 2005
What the Dell's going on?!
This got me wondering about the larger relationship between software and hardware and I pondered back to twenty years ago when I was doing a degree in maths and programming. At the time object-orientated languages were thin on the ground (Smalltalk was the only one I had any exposure to) and so working with either a procedural language (C, Pascal, COBOL etc.) or a functional language (LISP, Prolog) the developer could see how the abstraction applied to the final assembled code. All the programmers I graduated with (for example) could also code in Z80 and x86 assembler - not too many programmers can do that today. There was even the idea of induction to prove code. This was an idea that came from defense contracting that allowed you to show that a routine (typically in LISP) was good for every case by showing it worked for the specific case of n=1 and then for the general n+1 case. You could have confidence that a subroutine or even a whole program would work properly every time. Shoot forward to a few years ago when I was still running engineering for Resolution and I had to commission a database application that would support a 24-7 reality TV show and the programmer refused to stand by what he wrote - there was no way he'd be on call-out to fix any bugs we discovered down the line. It seems that as software development has moved into the realms of bolting objects together the idea of robustness has gone (get a programmer to explain the idea of garbage collection and why it is necessary in modern languages).
This is well illustrated if you compare the state of the two biggest NLE applications in the late 90's - Avid and Lightworks.
- Avid v.7, which if you used/installed/fixed it you'll know, was a capable application that needed a 300Mhz computer to run on a typically required 256megs of memory. It crashed often and took many minutes to boot. Judging by the multitude of error messages I got familiar with it was written in at least four languages and had components in it that hadn't been re-written in a decade (I know v.1 came out in 1991 but even today it has elements of EditDroid, the Lucas Film application that Avid acquired in the late 80's).
- Lightworks v.6, by comparison was a stable product that crashed once a month (on average), booted in under thirty seconds (due in part to DTX - they wrote their own disk handler rather than rely on an off-the-shelf OS!) and had an incredibly modest hardware requirement - a 66Mhz '486 with 64megs of RAM! It also came on three floppies!
Compare all this to how far hardware has come - back when I was doing that degree the 25Mhz '386 was the fastest cheap processor around and even then people were sounding the death-knell for the CISC architecture. The Von Neumann bottlekneck was perceived as a real problem for traditional processor design and RISC chips (especially the T800 series of transputers) were going to save IT. BUT, hardware design got better and all those problems haven't held back the Moore's Law express-train.
Tuesday, November 22, 2005
Tri Level Syncs
The thing to remember is that unlike HD-SDi video tri-syncs can be distributed much like normal black & burst - the same cables, jackfields, and even DAs and routers can be used to carry them. Equipment that uses tri-syncs will often need it's reference input switched (one day it's a 24P job, the next it's a 1080i (50 field) one) and so small composite routers and multi-o/p SPGs are a good idea.
The horizontal timing reference point for a standard bi-level sync signal is defined as the 50% point of the falling edge of the horizontal sync pulse. In order to ascertain this point precisely, it is necessary to clamp both black-level and sync-tip level and derive a value half way between. If the signal is in any way distorted, this will give H timing inaccuracy. With a relatively pedestrian standard def signal (line rate in the province of 15 Khz) this isn't such a big deal, but with 1080 lines per frame this becomes more significant and with a tri-level sync signal, the timing reference point is the rising edge of the sync signal as it passes through the black-level. This point is much easier to determine accurately, and can be implemented relatively easily. It is also more immune to signal distortion.
Monday, November 14, 2005
Sony's DRM "Root Kit" controversy
Anyhow - a very funny post on Sysinternal (who broke the story origionally):
f you want a more concrete proof, try to rename your favourite ripping software as $sys$whatever.exe and then run it again. You'll notice that the DRM system can no longer detect it, and thus you'll get good copy of the track you try to rip instead of one filled with noise.There is a worry that virus and other malware authors can exploit this loophole - but the idea that the very thing that Sony were trying to prevent now gets easier is funny.
Thats just hilarious. I think everyone should simply not worry about removing the rootkit, as this is too difficult, and then just do at Matti says, and use the rootkit to make your favorite ripping tool immune to the DRM. On second thought, is their software breaking the DMCA? It provides a method to bypass copyright protection that they install? Hmm...
A list of Sony/BMG disks that you should avoid.
23rd November update: It now appears that Sony had bundled the open source Lame encoder as part of the XCP install - in clear violation of the GNU public license. It seems it's OK for Sony BMG to install software on your PC that stops you from making legitimate use of the music you purchased and at the same time they're ripping off other people's IP!
You couldn't make it up!
Sunday, November 13, 2005
"He's running a bit rich"
Thursday, November 10, 2005
Operation Christmas Child
There is an anti-American undercurrent in the newspapers aimed at the chattering classes and I don't like it. Every American I've met (here and in the States) has been an entirely reasonable person. Surely you can hold a view that you dissapprove of Bush and the war and yet still feel affectionate towards normal Americans.
Anyhow - it's not too late - the couple of hours it'll take you to fill a shoebox with some goodies (and maybe £10 out of your Christmas budget) will be time and cash better spent than you'll ever realise.
Wednesday, November 09, 2005
Mix tapes!
Tuesday, November 08, 2005
Cerberus FTP server
It transpired that there was a hotfix over the weekend that "...addresses some compatibility issues with IIS and passive FTP transfers" - well, if the issue was it used to work then they have indeed addressed it with the now it doesn't solution! I suppose I could un-install IIS and re-install (not forgetting to disable auto-hotfix!) and spend half a day getting the configuration right but I tried Cerberus (Rupert mentioned it yesterday) and was amazed - installed and configured in twenty minutes and all my users are happy again. Yet another one of those cases of grasping the nettle and realising how easy it is to break away from Microsoft and how much better things seem to work afterwards.
Monday, November 07, 2005
Virtual desktop PPMs
11th Nov Update - Rupert has got this working with ExpressPro - very neat. In Settings you need to tell the audio tool to use the system mixer - select "mix" or "wave mix" in your Windows mixer tool record setting and you'll be off to the races!
Friday, November 04, 2005
Audiophile at I-Like-Jam
The Intelligent Chip is a one inch square, bright orange plastic wafer that, when placed on top of a compact disc player for 2-3 seconds, upgrades the disc (CD, DVD or SACD) being played at the time. The sound of the upgraded disc has more detail and articulation, better dynamics and an absence of "digital harshness." Voices are more human-sounding and less synthetic. The upgrade is permanent. Inside the white translucent Intelligent Chip case are two ultrathin, clear polycarbonate sheets, one on each side of the Chip. The manufacturer's product brochure states, "The Intelligent Chip should be put back into the packing case after using, because the packing case can protect the quantum material of the Intelligent Chip, preventing them from leaking."The nonesense goes on with reference to Schrodinger's cat and other quantum ideas, the summary is the best;
The Intelligent Chip works via coherent quantum superposition and quantum entanglement, in which two coherent light sources - the CD laser and the quantum dot laser in the chip - interact strongly with the atoms and molecules in the CD's polycarbonate layer to produce long-lasting, superior transparency for better optical signal to noise ratio (SNR). Laser light escapes the player via a number of small holes and gaps in the player case. The emitted light from the quantum dot laser instantly comingles with the CD laser light in the room and inside the player.Now what has escaped these people's attention is that with some CD players you can get the CD to show the number of errors in the bitstream (the Red Book standard specifies Miller Coding so errors are easy to spot). I used to have a Sony machine in the early nineties that had a maintenance mode that would make the display show the error count rather than track number etc. I had several disks that could play end to end with no errors - so, how can improving the s/n of the bitstream signal improve the final analogue sound if the digital signal wasn't noisey enough to give errors in the first place?!
However - the $1,500 power cord really got my goat! I wrote an email to the dude;
Hi,I'll let you know what comes back!
I just read your review of this power cable - did you write this for a joke or is it a paid-for "advertorial" for the company concerned?
If this power cable produced a measurable difference in sound reproduction why didn't you include some measurements (Total Harmonic Distortion, bandwidth figures, signal-to-noise etc.)? - Would you know how to measure these things?
"...like most other AC products, it will undergo changes in sound for three to five days after its application to a component. Judging the absolute merits of any AC product within this "settling period" will most often prove misleading. "
What, precisely, happens to a power cord during this "bedding in" period? For such a high sum you'd expect the manufacturer to burn the cable in for you!
What, in your view, makes this a good power cord? What was the impedance per metre? What about the capacitance? Do they make a different design for 50hz users? If it is so optimised the difference between 50 and 60Hz is surely significant.
Surely improvements and order of magnitude more significant than this could be achieved by hard-wiring the amp's mains input to the incoming mains feed from the street - even then they have merely used copper cabling for the mile back to the substation.
Regards,
Phil Crawley,
I really feel it's important to stand up against this pseudo-science and trickery.
Thursday, November 03, 2005
Hurray - I'll be able to park!
Wednesday, November 02, 2005
I'm Yoda, I'm a soldier
Tuesday, November 01, 2005
Monday, October 31, 2005
Sunday, October 30, 2005
Looks a bit like Fujifilm from the 1970's - green cast on everything (like all my childhood photos!)
Do you think they told them camera operators that they shouldn't let the actors see them! A bit like those shows where they trap dodgy plumbers with a PD150 hidden in a rucksack!
For me it really spoils the enjoyment because it puts something in the way, I can't help feeling like it's shot on a sound stage and is somehow less honest than it could have been.
Monday, October 24, 2005
I was around a friend's place yesterday - very nice meal Victoria, thanks! Anyhow - They'd had a Jornada 820 sitting in the cupboard from ages ago and I remembered I had THE ONLY wireless card that had a CE2.11 driver for it - The Lucent WaveLan Silver. I used to have a Jornada back in 1999/2000 and lived with it for more than a year and loved it. It booted in under a second and the battery lasted all day (and the following day as well!). I wish I still had it as folks ported Linux to it. I might start trawling eBay.
So, I loaded up the driver and got the machine working on their wireless network. It really was a capable little sub-laptop - a bit long in the tooth (the version of pocket IE works with very few modern websites) but fast (no hard drive - everything is in memory). Pocket Office still opens current versions of Word and Excel files too.
Norton Internet Security Suite is the worst bit of software ever! Bob had it installed on three of his machines in the hope that all the things it promised (freedom from Spam, Viruses and other nasties) were real. Two of the machines had the LDN Trojan which tries to open up an SMTP route through your internet connection and four minutes after boot it attempts to send out a shed-load of spam. Now the Norton firewall detected that activity but rather than temporarily blocking port 23 and telling you it pops several hundred windows that you can't close quick enough. I ended up having to tug the mains and re-boot. The bundled version of Anti-virus (even after an update) wasn't able to catch the nasty. So - after removing Norton and replacing it with AVG Free (and making sure the Windows firewall was on and working) Bob's comments was "wow this feels like a new computer - applications launch quickly and it feels like there is a 3Ghz processor under the covers!". Norton was letting him down similarly on all three machines! AVG had no problem catching the trojan and killing it.
Friday, October 21, 2005
Thursday, October 20, 2005
I saw this sign in Cafe Nero, Camden Town. It really does say
Hazelnuts, chocolate, contains nutsI shall think twice about buying coffee from there again! Maybe the coffee contains caffeine!
Wednesday, October 19, 2005
Hi Phil
So here I am checking out who's linking to our Lynn Parsons podcast page and your blog pops up! Freaky. I'm the producer of the show and I might perhaps play a couple of the characters but obviously I can't give too many secrets away!
If you've pretty much given up on conventional radio (like I have - bar The Today Programme) then check out Lynn's podcast - see the right-hand bar.